West of the Olt the Oltenian plain is a series of terraces reaching up to 984 feet in elevation. East of the Olt is the Baragan plain. The Oltenian area was largely forested in the past. The Baragan area had fewer forests. Also known as Wallachia, a name derived from the Vlachs, as the people were called who lived here at the beginning of the 10th century.
- the Greeks established colonies on the shore of the Black Sea -Histria, Tomis (now Constanta) and Callatis1 (now Mangalia) -during the 7th-6th centuries B.C. In 514 BC the Dacians strongly resisted a Persian army of King Darius I. In the 3rd century BC, Geto-Dacian tribes on the Wallachian plain withstood attack by King Lysimachus of Thrace under their leader, Dromichaetes. Burebista (70-44 BC), a strong Dacian ruler, extended his control over the Greek Black Sea cities and as far north as Bohemia. Another Dacian ruler, Decebalus (AD 87-106) brought the Dacian state to the pinnacle of its centralization and independence. He was finally slain after two campaigns (AD 101-2 and 105-6) against the Roman legions of the Emperor Trajan. Dacia then became a Roman province, and the Romans brought in colonists to settle it.
- Dacia remained Roman from 106 to 271, and the Latin tongue replaced the old Thraco-Illyrian, although some of its common words remained in usage. Gradually the Daco-Roman population was assimilated and became Romanized. The Romans built roads, bridges, fortifications, and other works in Dacia. These were left behind as the frontiers of the empire came under attack by successive waves of barbarian invaders. These invasions would last a thousand years. Decius temporarily halted the Goths at Nicopolis on the Danube, and in 251 perished at Abritum in another battle with the Goths. Claudius defeated the Goths in Serbia in 268. Aurelian beat back the Alemanni but decided Rome could not hold Dacia and ordered it evacuated in 271, yielding the land north of the Danube to the barbarian hordes. Nearly all the invaders that swarmed into southern Europe until the 10th century marched into Romanian lands.
- after the 4th century, waves of migratory peoples passed over the Wallachian and Moldavian plains. The Goths stayed long on Romanian soil, but there is little or no trace of their having been there. Their language had no effect on that spoken by the Latinized populace. Later, a Mongolian race, the Huns, occupied the area between the Danube and Tisza rivers from 375-453. On the heels of the Huns came a Gothic stock people, the Gepidae (453-566) who allied themselves with the eastern Roman empire headquartered at Constantinople. They were followed by a relativeof the Huns, the Avars (566-799), who came in just ahead of the Slavs. The Slavs had been infiltrating the area for some time, and now they came in great numbers. Settling on the plains of Romania with the Romanized people, they later moved to the Carpathian highlands, settling in its valleys. In time the Slavs became assimilated with the Romanians. The Bulgars, a people related to the Huns, swept in during 679, adopted the slavic language, and became assimilated with the Slavs. One of the Bulgar leaders, Boris I, was baptized in 865 in the Orthodox Church. Legend says his Christian motives occurred after a Byzantine painted a gruesome picture of hell on his palace wall. The Daco-Roman population had already accepted Christianity in the 2nd and 3rd centuries. In 840 and 890 the Hunnish Magyars occupied the Danubian plains but eventually gave them up and settled in what is now Hungary and Yugoslavia. The Transylvanian province of Romania was ruled by Hungary from the 11th century until 1918. Of the hordes of migratory people, the Magyars planted the last permanent settlements on European soil. The Pechenegs succeeded the Magyars on the plains of Romania and then disappeared, probably in wars with their neighbours and Byzantium. In 1050 there came the Cumans, a Finno-Ugric tribe, who also eventually settled in Hungary. In 1241 the last of the conquering hordes, the Mongolian Tatars, seized coastal areas of Romania. At the beginning of modern times, the Ottoman Turks extended their empire into Romania in the 1300s.
- the first mention of the Romanians in the lands
that eventually became their kingdom appear in documents dated in the 1160s.
According to a Byzantine chronicler, a large force of Wallachs (or ancient
Italian colonists) assisted the Byzantine army in a campaign against the
Hungarians. Later a strong Bulgaro-Romanian kingdom was defeated by Hungary
in 1230, and Wallachia continued as a fief of the Hungarians. From 1290
to 1308 Prince Basarab established a principality over Wallachia that was
semi-independent of Hungary. Subsequently, in the middle of the 1300s another
prince, Bogdan, created the principality of Moldavia. Meanwhile, Transylvania
under Hungarian rule enjoyed a high level of autonomy until 1526; and Dobruja,
another feudal state, gained independence in the early 14th century and
would later unite with Wallachia.
At the end of the 14th
century the Turks stood on the shores of the Danube, and there now came
to the forefront several Romanian leaders who became prominent in their
struggles with the Ottoman Empire. The first of these was Mircea the Old
of Wallachia (1386-1418). He annexed Dobruja and won a victory over the
Turks in 1394 but later accepted Turkish suzerainty. Other Wallachian princes,
Dan II (1420-1431) and Vlad the Impaler (1456-62, 1476),continued the struggle.
Vlad had some success fighting the Turks, but in 1462 they marched into
Wallachia. Meanwhile, Alexander the Good of Moldavia (1401-1431) helped
stabilize his principality.
Wallachian Cities
BUCHAREST - The city developed on the site of a Dacian settlement but was first mentioned in documents only in 1459.
CONSTANTA - is
located on the Black Sea. The site and locality of Constanta
is rich in legend, mythology, and history. The foundations of the city
were laid in the 6th century BC when Greek colonists built the city Tomis
on its site.
Burebista, a Dacian
chieftain, occupied Tomis and the Greek cities along the coast in the 1st
century BC and organized them into a strong Dacian state that extended
to the Carpathians. The Dacian state reached the height of its power under
Decebalus (87-106). Roman legions under Emperor Trajan occupied Dacia in
106; and the process of Romanization of the Dacians began, which lasted
until 271. Gradually the Daco-Roman population became a Latin-speaking
people. The Romans gave the name Scythia Minor to the present region of
Dobruja, including the Black Sea coast around Constanta. In the
4th century, Christianity spread into the Danubian provinces.
With the spread of the
influence of the Eastern Roman Empire headquartered in Contantinople into
the Black Sea coastal area, Tomis was again modernized and changed in its
features.Constantine the Great ordered the city rebuilt and changed its
name to Constantiana to honour his sister. Rebuilt in the 4th century,
the city was left in ruins by the migratory Avars in the 6th century.
BRAILA - Braila
is located on the west bank of the Danube river in the southeastern part
of Romania. The city lies 21 miles south of Galati.
The first document to
mention the city originated in 1368 by a Wallachian prince. By his authority
goods were permitted to be shipped into and out of Braila by traders
from the city of Brasov. On the Danube just north of the city there
are the ruins of an ancient bridge which tradition says was built by Darius
I, the Persian king who invaded the area of Wallachia in 514 BC.
PLOIESTI - it is situated on the Wallachian plain between the Prahova and Teleajen River valleys. It is located 37 miles north of Bucharest. Ploiesti was a small city.
CRAIOVA - was first
mentioned in a document on June 1, 1475; less than 20 years later another
document specified that the headquarters of the bania, an important
feudal, political, and military institution, was moved from Strehaia to
Craiova and that its authority was extended over the whole Oltenian territory.
The Geto-Dacians had
a settlement here called Plendava; the Romans erected a castrum;
and the traces of the defense wall crossing Oltenia from the west to the
east, known as Trajan's Wall, can still be seen in Craiova.
BUZAU - is located
68 miles northeast of Bucharest on the south bank of the Buzau River.
The Buzau River is a tributary of the Siret, which enters the Danube
near Galati.
DROBETA-TURNU SEVERIN
- located on the Danube River in southwest Romania, Drobeta-Turnu Severin
is situated on the northern bank of the river where it forms a large bend
in its course after exiting the Iron Gates. Drobeta-Turnu Severin was founded
on the site of a former Dacian settlement known as Drobeta. The Romans
knew the town as Drobetae or Drubetis. In the third century AD the Roman
Emperor Severus built a tower there to commemorate a local victory. The
tower was called Turris Severi (Tower of Severus) and contributed
its name to that of the present-day city. Between AD 98 and 102 the Emperor
Trajan had a narrow road chiseled out of stone on the nearby Yugoslav side
of the Danube through the Iron Gates. This road, cut six feet into the
rock, ran a distance of 12 miles. The ancient Roman road was connected
with the Romanian side of the Danube by Trajan's Bridge (built between
103 and 105). It was the longest bridge ever built by the Romans in their
empire.
The town became the
capital of the Banat of Severin in the twelfth century. A medieval citadel
that protected it was destroyed in the sixteenth century by the Turks.
TIRGOVISTE
- located 51 miles northwest of Bucharest in the valley of the Ialomita
River, a tributary of the Danube.
Between the 14th and
17th centuries, Tirgoviste was the capital of Wallachia.
The city is full of
history with its old buildings, churches, monastery, and the old palace.
The palace was founded by Mircea the Old, ruler of Wallachia (1386-1418).
The palace is mentioned in a document dated 1396.
SLATINA - located on the Olt river. It was built in the 14th century.
RIMNICU VILCEA
- located on both banks of the Olt river. The city lies in the
foothills of the Subcarpathians.
Transylvanian Cities2
BRASOV - lies
106 miles north of Bucharest. It is located in the central part of Romania
and lies in the major gateways leading through the central part of the
Carpathians. Nearby mountain passes lead to Wallachia and Moldavia.
In 1211 the Teutonic
Order of Knights settled on the site of Brasov; German settlers
poured into the area and gave the name Kronstadt to their settlement. The
district around Kronstadt was called Burzenland by the Germans. Kronstadt
was one of seven major fortified towns which the Germans founded in Transylvania.
In 1224 King Andrew of Hungary granted the Saxons, descendants of the original
German settlers, a large degree of autonomy which they were vigilant in
maintaining for centuries. The Saxons believed their autonomy helped to
preserve their cultural and ethnic identity and attempted to keep the Romanians
and Magyars out of important positions in their towns or from owning property
in them. The traditional rights and privileges of the Saxon "nation" continued
even after Transylvania passed into the hands of the Habsburgs.
The city was attacked
by the Turks on several occasions, who successfully took it in 1421 before
its citadel was completed. In 1434 the Turks again attacked it, but this
time they were repulsed by heavy fortifications.
TIMISOARA - set
amidst a rich plain, crossed by the Bega River. Timisoara is situated
near the Yugoslavian border.
Timisoara is
an ancient settlement. The former Castrum Temesiensis was mentioned
in documents dating as far back as 1212. The Tatars sacked the city in
the 13th century. During the 15th century it was rebuilt and enlarged by
Lancu of Hunedoara, who was count of Timis at the time (1441).
- HUNIAD CASTLE - was built on the site of the former city which was a
seat of the Romanian ruling princes for centuries. It was erected by Carol
Robert d'Anjou in 1316 and redecorated and enlarged by Lancu of Hunedoara
(15th century).
SIBIU - is located in
the southern part of the Transylvanian plateau. The city lies astride the
banks of the Cibin River, a tributary of the Olt.
The Romans were here and built a settlement
(Cibinium) to guard one of their principal roads leading into Transylvania.
The city's proximity to the Turnu Rosu pass made it an important
transportation and communication artery. The site of the old city is mentioned
in documents as being founded in 1191, when settlers from Saxony arrived
on its location. Many Germans settled in the area and the town became known
as Hermannstadt.
Medieval Sibiu was the
site of a fortress built in the13th century, which was destroyed by the
Tatars in 1241 and rebuilt a century later.
ALBA IULIA - located
at the juncture of highly traveled ancient roads. It is located in the
middle of the country at the confluence of the Ampoi and Mures rivers
in the eastern part of the Western Mountains.
Alba Iulia was a municipality
at the time of Septimius Severus (2nd-3rd centuries AD); and the town,
then the capital of the province of Dacia Apulensis, was well known (it
was called Apulum).
Under the name of Balgrad
(White Fortress) during the 8th-13th centuries, it became a local Romanian
political center (probably governed by Voivode Geiu). It survived the Tatar
invasion.
The Saxons knew it as
Karlsburg or Weissenburg.
- ROMAN CATHOLIC CATHEDRAL - The lateral naves shelter the sarcophagi of
Lancu of Hunedoara and the Zapolya and Sigismund royal families.
- SINTIMBRU VILLAGE - in the Mures River valley (7
miles northeast). Lancu of Hunedoara fought one of his first battles here
against the Turkish armies.
- CRAIVA VILLAGE - is located at the bottom of Piatra Craivii Mountain
(13 miles northwest). The Dacian fortress, (2nd century BC - 1st century
AD), stretching across the high plateau and several artificial terraces,
is the remains of ancient Apulon mentioned by Ptolomy (AD 90-168) in his
Geography.
- SEBES - a town at the confluence of the Secas and Sebes
rivers, 11 miles south of Alba Iulia. Settled in the 12th-13th centuries,
it became an important center of government in 1345 and a powerful trade
center during the Middle Ages.
DEVA - located south
of the Mures River, at the foot of the last branches of the Poiana-Ruscai
Mountains.
After a period of disorganization
created by the death of the great king of the Dacians, Burebista (44 BC),
who achieved the first centralized Dacian state, the area was reorganized
under the leadership of the brave and wise king of all Dacians, Decebalus
(AD 87-106). In this process, the area surrounding the capital of the state,
Sarmizegethusa, became quite important. The traces of the Roman rule in
Dacia, following their victory in 106 under the Emperor Trajan, are numerous
throughout the county. Archaeological findings in this area point to intense
and permanent settlement by the Daco-Roman population after the withdrawal
of Roman legions from Dacia (AD 271). The homogeneous Romanian population
organized its ranks while keeping in close contact with the Romanians beyond
the Carpathians and made strong opposition to the expansion and exploitation
of their area by the Magyar nobility.
- SARMIZEGETHUSA - this village, located in Hunedoara County in the western
part of the country, was the capital of ancient Dacia. It lies near the
town of Orastie. Founded in the 2nd century BC, it was the economic,
military, political, and religious center of the Dacian state. In the old
precincts, destroyed when the city was conquered by the Roman imperial
armies.
Rebuilt by the Romans
after the conquest of Dacia Sarmizegethusa became the headquarters of a
detachment of the 4th Legion Flavia Felix.
- ULPIA TRAIANA SARMIZEGETHUSA - 38 miles from Deva. The citadel was founded,
in AD 110, after the conquest of Dacia by the Romans, on order of Emperor
Trajan, and soon became an important political, religious, and cultural
center. It lies to the west of the Dacian city of the same name. After
conquering the old Dacian capital, the Romans founded its counterpart on
a plain whose site they preferred to that of the mountainous capital. They
built a large citadel, an amphitheater, and other buildings at their town,
which they called Colonia Ulpia Traiana Augusta Dacia Sarmizegethusa.
Moldavian Cities
GALATI - the city is situated where the Danube, after flowing north, bends to the east for its final run to the Black Sea.
SUCEAVA - located in
a picturesque hilly area on the banks of the Suceava. It was the residence
of the Moldavian princes (14th-16th centuries).
As the old capital of
Moldavia, Suceava is mentioned in documents of the 14th century (Prince
Petru Musat I erected the Princely Citadel here after 1388, still
intact). Suceava was a famous commercial center and customs site in the
15th and 16thcenturies.
- PRINCELY CITADEL - it stands on a high hill on the eastside of town.
The Princely Citadel was originally erected to serve as a fortified castle
for Prince Petru Musat I, who moved Moldavia's capital from Siret
to Suceava. Around 1400, Alexander the Kind changed it to a citadel with
a strong military presence.
- MONUMENT OF MEDIEVAL ARCHITECTURE MIRAUTI - was founded by Petru
Musat I (14th century). The building was the site of the coronation
of the first princes of Moldavia.
- PRINCELY COURT - It was first built of stone by Stephen the Great on
the ruins of a wooden palace dating from the reign of Petru Musat.
DANUBE RIVER AND DELTA
- the Danube has since earliest times been one of the most traveled waterways of the continent. The Danube has been called by many names: "Istros" in Egyptian legends and in the language of the Argonauts; "Phisos" by the Phoenicians; "Danare" by the Romans; "Danubius" in the language of the Scythians; "Rio-Divino" at the court of Charles V.
ENISALA - 5 miles east of Babadag (23 miles south of Tulcea). In ancient times it was a walled city by the same name, later a Roman military camp, then a Genoese and Turkish fortification, ruled over a time (14th century) by Mircea the Old, ruling prince of Wallachia.
Dacia Before the Roman Conquest
The earliest known inhabitants of the present
kingdom of Roumania were the Getae or Dacians, of whom ancient Greek and
Roman writers make such frequent mention. Herodotus has much to say about
the Getae, who early came into contact with the Greek colonies on the West
Coast of the Black Sea. He calls them "the bravest and most honourable
of all the Thracian tribes," and speaks of them as endeavouring to oppose
the march of the Persian King Darius. Thucydides alludes to their prowess
with the bow and arrow on horseback, and fixes their abode on the shore
of the Euxine. At that time however, they had not yet crossed the Danube,but
were living in the district south of that river known as the Dobrudza.
...Alexander the Great in the course of his
Thracian expedition, found himself confronted on the left bank of the Danube
by an army of Getic horsemen and foot-soldiers, who refused to allow him
to land. Undaunted, he waited till night came on, crossed the river lower
down at daybreak and fell upon the Getae, whom he defeated and put to flight.
But the defeat had no lasting results. Some fifty years later they had
their revenge. Lysimachus, who succeeded to the Thracian dominions of Alexander,
attempted to chastise them for the assistance they had rendered to the
barbarous tribes of Macedonia. But he made the mistake of despising his
enemy. Wearied with long marches, and oppressed with thirst in a barren
land, his great army was forced to surrender to the Getic king, Dromichaetes.
The victor displayed an unwanted generosity towards the vanquished Macedonian.
He led him to his capital, a place called Helis and treated him as his
honoured guest. Lysimachus secured his liberty by the payment of a heavy
ransom, and 50 years ago (circa 1845) gold pieces, bearing his name, were
found in Roumania, where the natives used them as signet rings and ornaments.
But with the first appearance of the Romans
on the confines of Dacia a new era in the history of the nation began.The
first conflict between the two peoples took place in 111 BC, when the Roman
legions, already masters of Macedonia, had advanced to the Danube, and
found the Dacians assisting the tribesmen of the right bank against them.
For some time, no Roman general thought it desirable to enter their territory;
and when at last a commander crossed the Danube, he hesitated to entrust
himself to the somber gorges of the Carpathians, where the Dacian warriors
lurked in readiness to surprise the rash invader. If it had not been for
the incursions of the Dacians into the Roman provinces, a Roman occupation
might have been indefinitely postponed, and the Roumanian race might never
have existed.
But under a king called Boerebistes these
raids became so serious, that Rome was alarmed for her supremacy in the
Balkans. Boerebistes was at the head of a powerful nation, which had gradually
absorbed all the minor races up to the frontier of modern Bavaria, and
could put two hundred thousand men into the field. His soldiers had been
seen as far south as the Balkan slopes, and were threatening Macedonia
and the Dalmatian coast. Caesar himself was meditating a Dacian campaign,
and had actually assembled troops for it, when the dagger of Brutus laid
him low. The Dacians would have been no unworthy foe of the great Roman
captain. They were well armed and well led. They knew the use of breast-plates
and helmets, and their curved swords were scarcely less deadly than the
poisoned arrows, which they fired from horseback.
...The exploits of the Dacian king Cotiso
are mentioned by contemporary Roman authors, and the gossips of the forum
would have it that Augustus intended to marry the daughter of the terrible
barbarian, and thus secure peace for the Empire. Whenever the Danube was
frozen over, the Dacians crossed on the ice and ravaged the Roman province
of Moesia far and wide. The fortified towns on the Black Sea kept their
gates shut night and day for fear of these savage warriors, and the poet
Ovid, who spent several years of exile among them, wrote with the utmost
respect of their martial prowess. The death and defeat of Cotiso, though
hailed with enthusiasm at Rome, and followed up by the construction of
forts along the right bank of the Danube, were merely temporary checks
to the Dacian power.
The policy of the early Roman Emperors was
to prevent the Dacian bands from crossing the river, not to annex their
country to the Empire. When the civil war of 69 AD necessitated the withdrawal
of the legions from Moesia, a Dacian invasion of that province at once
followed, which was repulsed by orders of Vespasian. Once again, the sole
means of pacifying the people was to transplant them over the river. Dacia
at this period was little more than a desert, and it looked as if the nation
were on the point of disappearing, when a great chief arose and led it
to renewed victories. This man was Decebalus whose name, "the strength
of the Dacians," is the most appropriate summary of his career. Possessing
a scientific as well as a practical knowledge of warfare, he spent the
first two years of his reign in making preparations for attacking the Roman
possessions south of the Danube. It is said that he even attempted to form
an alliance with the Parthians against the common foe. In 86 he at last
crossed the Danube with a disciplined army behind him, and drove the Romans
to the Balkans before him. Two Roman generals succumbed to his arms,and
the historian Tacitus might well regret the defeat of the Roman legions
and the capture of a Roman standard. At the news of this double reverse
the Emperor Domitian took the field in person against the Dacian monarch.
But he cautiously remained at his headquarters in a small Moesian town,
and entrusted his lieutenant, Julianus, with the task of bearding Decebalus
in his own country. Julianus defeated the Dacians at a place called Tapae,
the site of which is uncertain, and besieged, for the first time in its
history, the capital of Sarmizegethusa, the modern Varhely. But the exigencies
of Roman policy necessitated a speedy peace, for there were other dangerous
tribes besides the Dacians to be subdued. Decebalus had no objection to
come to terms with his enemy, and sent his brother as an envoy to the Roman
camp. The favourable concessions, which he obtained from Domitian, prove
that the Emperor was afraid of driving him to extremities. Decebalus restored
the prisoners, whom he had taken, and received in return the title of king;
while Domitian added the surname of "the Dacian" to his other designations,
and celebrated on his return an empty triumph in honour of his vicarious
successes. Domitian had, in fact, bought his scanty laurels by the promise
of an annual tribute to Decebalus.
But the accession of Trajan, in 98, soon put
an end to this ignominious arrangement. The fullest preparations were made
to show the "barbarians" that they were no longer able to insult the majesty
of Rome with impunity. Six legions were assembled at the present town of
Kostolac (Viminacium) in Serbia, where they were reviewed by the Emperor.
A durable monument of the war exists to this day in the Roman road, begun
by Domitian and finished by Trajan, along the right bank of the Danube
as far as a point opposite Orsova. In some places the road was hewn
through solid rock, in others it consisted of planks fastened over the
water along the perpendicular face of the cliff. Crossing the Danube on
two bridges of boats at Kostolac and Orsova respectively, the Romans
entered Dacia in two divisions, while the two flotillas supplied them with
provisions. The Dacians themselves recognised that this time they had a
man to deal with, and sent a gigantic fungus to the Emperor, upon which
was scratched in Roman characters the request that he would leave them
alone.
But the Emperor's march was slow and difficult.
No fewer than eighteen months were spent in advancing sixty-five miles
to the spot where the two divisions of the army were to meet. The mountains
lent themselves to guerilla warfare, at which the Dacians excelled; huge
boulders of rock were rolled down upon the heads of the soldiers as they
entered the narrow ravines; showers of arrows impeded their progress as
they forded the deep streams. At Tapae, the spot where Decebalus had been
defeated fourteen years earlier, they at last met the foe in open combat.
The victory of the Romans was hardly bought. The invaders now marched upon
the Dacian capital, which, after a desperate engagement, fell into their
hands. A great booty, including the standard,which had been captured by
the Dacians in the last war, rewarded the Romans for their hardships. Decebalus
saw himself deserted by his allies, his sister taken prisoner, his treasures
carried off. He bowed his neck to the yoke, resolving to reserve himself
for better days. The Emperor dictated peace on his own terms. He ordered
the king to surrender all his arms, to dismiss the Roman deserters, who
had joined his army, to raze his fortresses and abandon all his foreign
conquests. Trajan was contented with what he had accomplished. Leaving
a garrison behind him at Sarmizegethusa, he took with him to Rome a Dacian
embassy, for the ratification of the treaty.
But there was little finality about
Trajan's first expedition. Decebalus had only submitted as a temporary
expedient, and as soon as his conqueror had gone, he recommenced his forays,
and formed a fresh league of tribes against the Roman Empire. Trajan resolved
that this time he would finally annex Dacia to his dominions and have done
with these troublesome warriors, who had only submitted in order the better
to attack him. As a first step towards the annexation of the country, he
ordered the construction of a more permanent means of communication than
the bridge of boats, which had served to convey his army across the Danube
during his former campaign. Opposite the present
town of Turnu-Severin there may still be seen in the river several piles
of the magnificent stone bridge which Apollodorus of Damascus, the most
famous architect of that period, erected for the Emperor in 104 AD.3
This done, Trajan declared war against Decebalus, who endeavoured to rid
himself of his great enemy by assassination. He had previously seized the
commander of the Roman garrison at Sarmizegethusa and refused to give him
up, unless the Emperor recompensed him for his losses in the last war.
The brave Roman officer took poison in order to relieve Trajan from this
dilemma, and the scanty ruins of the mausoleum, which his grateful master
raised to his memory, are still to be seen a little to the north of Varhely.
The second Dacian campaign of Trajan was easier
than the first. Decebalus offered to make peace. But Trajan replied that
he must first lay down his arms. The Dacian monarch preferred to die, and
held out with a mere handful of men against the Roman army. No quarter
was given on either side; the Roman soldiers cut off the heads of their
prisoners and stuck them on pikes; the Dacian women fastened their captives'
hands behind their backs and applied torches to their bare bodies. A final
battle beneath the walls of the capital ended the war. The Dacians set
fire to the town and took poison to avoid falling into the hands of their
enemies. Decebalus, tracked by the legionaries to his retreat in the mountains,
sank exhausted at the foot of a tree; and when the Romans advanced to seize
him, plunged a dagger into his breast. Dacia lay at the mercy of the conqueror.
By the end of 106 it had become a Roman province. The Emperor, after remaining
a short time to arrange for its future administration, returned to celebrate,
by what was perhaps the most magnificent spectacle of ancient Rome, his
final subjugation of the Dacian people.
The most striking memorial of his Dacian conquest
is to be seen at Rome. Trajan's Column is an epitome in marble of his two
campaigns against Decebalus, and forms a priceless commentary upon the
early history of Roumania.
The Romans in Roumania
The Roman province of Dacia, which was constituted
upon the ruins of the kingdom of Decebalus, was considerably larger than
modern Roumania. For the Dacian realm had included Transylvania and other
portions of what is now Austro-Hungary, and the circumference of the province
was thirteen hundred miles.
The ravages of war had decimated the natives,
and in order to people so large an area it was necessary to import colonists
from the Roman Empire. Trajan summoned to Dacia the veterans of his legions,
the landless proletarians of Rome, the venturesome inhabitants of Spain
and Gaul. Italy doubtless furnished the bulk of the immigrants. Some colonists
were attracted by glowing reports of the Dacian gold mines, others expected
to find their El Dorado in the adminstration of the new province. Lawyers
and doctors were, of course, necessary to the civilization of the "poor
barbarians" and both professions were overcrowded in Rome. The new arrivals
intermarried with the survivors of the Dacian race, and the offspring of
these Daco-Roman alliances perpetuated the characteristics of both parents.
The peace, which followed the triumph of the
Roman arms, assisted the amalgamation of the new and old elements in the
population. Those Dacians, who had left their country rather than live
under the foreign yoke, gradually returned when they saw that their fellow-countrymen
were well treated by the conquerors. The famous edict of the Emperor Caracalla,
which extended the citizenship of Rome to every inhabitant of the Empire,
placed the "barbarian" on an equal footing with the true born Roman in
the eye of the law,and reconciled him to the loss of his independence.
Commerce and agriculture flourished, new mines were opened, new towns rose.
Palaces, roads, baths, all the usual appendages of Roman life, sprang into
existence. Dacia merited the epithet of "blessed" (Dacia Felix),
which was ascribed to her on Roman medals; all over Roumania the indelible
marks of the Roman occupation can be seen to this day. The national
religion, which might have been a dangerous obstacle to the progress of
Roman ideas, became merged in the elastic creed of the conquerors. The
mysterious grotto of Zalmoxis was closed; the solemn banquets of his worshippers
ceased; and Jupiter took the place of the deity in the religious life of
the people.
The Dacians gradually lost, under the influence
of Western civilization, those fierce characteristics which had made them
the terror of the provinces beyond the Danube. Occasionally, we hear of
disturbances, and in one instance, during the reign of Antoninus Pius,
of a serious revolt. But, generally speaking, after about the year 120,
when Hadrian meditated the withdrawal of his legions from Dacia and the
destruction of Trajan's bridge across the Danube, the Roman occupation
was firmly established in the country. Hadrian's scheme of evacuation was
due to his desire to keep the barbarians out of Moesia, and his successors
for the next century and a half followed the alternative policy of making
Dacia an outpost of the Empire against the attacks of savage hordes. Three
great military roads, still visible in many places, united the principal
towns of the province; while a fourth, called by Trajan's name, traversed
the depths of the Carpathians and entered Transylvania by the Turnu Rosa
or Rothenthurm Pass. Two legions were usually stationed in Dacia, and their
headquarters, together with the seat of government, were fixed at Apulum,
the modern Karlsburg in Transylvania. On the ruins of Sarmizegethusa rose
the stately Roman town of Ulpia Trajana, whose memory is still preserved
by a few carved stones and a heap of broken pillars.
With the advent of the third century the incursions
of the barbarians became more threatening. Caracalla, about 212, defeated
a horde of invaders, and erected as a trophy of victory the town of Karakal.
The "tower of Severus", Turnu-Severin, on the Danube, marks the defeat
of the tribes of Quadi and Marcomanni a few years later. But a more deadly
enemy now appeared upon the frontiers. In 247 we hear of the first invasions
of the Goths. From this date the old historians of Roumania date the decline
of the province. At first, however, the Goths simply used Dacia as a stepping-stone
to Moesia, on the other side of the Danube, and did not tarry by the way.
But they soon found the one province as attractive as the other, and between
247 and 268 there were six invasions, one of which cost a Roman Emperor
his life. The shrewdest Romans already regarded the Dacian province as
lost. The great victory of the Emperor Claudius over the Goths at Naissus
in 269, while it rid Moesia of their presence, left Dacia still at their
mercy. The Roman legions, entrenched in the natural fastnesses of the Carpathians,
could protect themselves, but were powerless to save the peaceful inhabitants
of the plains. The next Emperor, Aurelian, resolved to evacuate the province,
which he could no longer hold, and fall back upon the Danube as his firstline
of defence. About the year 274 the Roman garrisons withdrew across the
river, and took with them all the Daco-Roman colonists who cared to follow
them. South of the Danube, in parts of what are now Serbia and Bulgaria,
a new home preserved under the name of "Aurelian's Dacia," or Dacia
Aureliani, the memory of the old.
The Barbarians in Roumania
The Gothic supremacy, which lasted for a century,
was a period of comparative tranquility. The victors lost much of their
ferocity by contact with the vanquished; the natives pursued their agricultural
pursuits without interference, and found ample occupation in cultivating
the lands which their fellow-countrymen had abandoned when they migrated
southward. Once, for moment, the exiles returned in the train of the Roman
Emperor Constantine, who not only repulsed the attacks of the Goths upon
the provinces south of the Danube about 330, but built a bridge across
the river, like Trajan, though much lower down, between the Bulgarian town
of Nicopolis and the modern Romanian village of Turnu-Magurele. Constantine
assumed the title of "restorer of Dacia", but contented himself with compelling
the Goths to furnish a force of auxiliaries, and soon withdrew from a position
which he could not maintain. But his victory introduced the doctrines of
Christianity among the Goths. It is possible that the Daco-Roman colonists
had already been converted, for we hear of a Dacian bishop at an early
council of the Church. By 360 Dacia was a part of Christendom.
The second batch of invaders was much more
terrible than the first. The Goths were mild and civilised as compared
with the savage Huns, who entered Roumania in 375. The Huns, with their
pitiless cruelty, filled the inhabitants with horror and alarm. Many of
the Goths were allowed by the Romans to settle on the other side of the
Danube, while the natives either remained in the plans of Roumania or retreated
to the fastnesses of the Carpathians. The defeat of the Huns by the Roman
Emperor Theodosius I about 378 was only a temporary relief. The whole aspect
of the land changed under its new masters; all settled habits of life disappeared,
and nomad tribes ravaged the Danubian provinces almost without intermission.
Then the "scourge of God," as Attila has been called, fell upon those unhappy
regions. Modern Bulgaria, as well as Roumania, succumbed to his armies,
and the Romans acknowledged him as the ruler of the latter country. But
his own allies turned against him at a critical moment. The Gepidae, a
Gothic race, under their King Ardaric, overthrew his dominion in Roumania
and established there a new kingdom; Attila perished in 453, and with his
death the Huns vanished from the Danube.
The Gepidae maintained their hold upon the
country for a century, and gave it their own name of Gepidia. We know little
about them beyond the fact of their existence. At one moment they were
at war with the Roman Empire, at another they were its allies. But two
far more formidable foes appeared about the middle of the sixth century
in the persons of the Lombards and the Avars, the former coming from the
Baltic coast, the latter from the plains of Asia. United by the common
desire for plunder, under the leadership of Alboin, these two tribes speedily
overthrew the Gepidae, with such complete success that the vanquished race
henceforth disappears. The Lombards did not stay long in the land. Accepting
the invitation of Emperor Justinian to enter his service, they crossed
the Danube, leaving Roumania to the Avars.The latter ruled more or less
continuously in the country for eighty years, though the seat of their
empire was on the site of Attila's ancient capital in the midst of the
great Hungarian plain, and not in Roumania itself. But they included it
in their dominions until their defeat by the Emperor Heraclius in their
campaign against Constantinople in 626. By the middle of the seventh century
Roumania knew them no more. Five different hordes of barbarians had swept
over that unfortunate country since the Romans left, and still the descendants
of the old Roman colonists remained in their mountain retreat, little affected
by the waves which, one after another, had covered their land.
The emperor had been aided in his victory
over the Avars by the Bulgarian chief Kurt, or Kuvrat, a former vassal
of the Avar king. Kuvrat and his successors obtained power in the old Dacian
province north of the Danube, as well as in what is now Bulgaria; and in
the reign of their powerful chieftain Krum, who flourished about the year
810, they occupied a large part of Roumania. During the first Bulgarian
Empire, which lasted from 893-1018, Roumania was largely in Bulgarian hands.
The warlike Hungarian race took up its abode
in the eastern part of Roumania about 839. The strange habits and fierce
disposition of the early Hungarians made them a terror to all their neighbours;
their career of devastation recalled the memory of Attila's campaigns.
Their food was the raw flesh of animals; their drink the milk of mares
or the blood of their enemies. The Bulgarian monarch, Simeon, then at the
zenith of his power, inflicted a severe defeat upon those who had dared
to cross the Danube and approach his Balkan capital. During their temporary
absence on a western campaign he devastated their settlements in Bessarabia,
and, finding their home destroyed, they wandered westward again, and made
the present country of Hungary their headquarters.
While the Hungarians migrated to the West
across the Carpathians, another tribe, called Patzinakitai, had entered
the Roumanian land. Powerful in Roumania in the tenth and eleventh centuries,
the Patzinakitai are heard of two hundred years later,when they merged
in the Hungarian nation, leaving no traces of their separate existence
behind them. Another barbarian tribe, the Kumani, had driven them from
their seats on the Danube.
After the First Bulgarian Empire had fallen,
the old Dacian province north of the Danube gradually came under the rule
of the Kumani, and recieved from them the name of Kumania. It was an era
of comparative peace for the inhabitants. The barbarian inroads had ceased,
and the descendants of the old Daco-Roman colonists could cultivate their
farms without disturbance upon paying a tribute to their masters. The commercial
importance of Roumania became recognized abroad, and a diploma of 1134
acknowledges the flourishing condition of the region round the town of
Berlad, not far from the Pruth, where a sort of democratic commonwealth
existed under an elected magistrate. There the products of the Levant were
exchanged for the merchandise of Russia, Hungary, and Bohemia, and a brisk
business was carried on with the Greek traders of the Black Sea.
The long era of barbarian rule in Roumania
was drawing at last to a close. The Kumani, who were converted to Christianity
in1227, ceased to be dangerous soon afterwards, and succumbed to the attacks
of the Mongol Tatars about 1240. This was the final eruption of savage
hordes into the country. The only other foreigners who exercised power
there at this period were men of avery different stamp, the Teutonic Knights
and the Knights of St. John, who for a score of years at the beginning
of the thirteenth century obtained grants of Roumanian land from the King
of Hungary.
The Two Principalities
After the departure of the Tatar hordes about
the middleof the thirteenth century, the Roumanians of the mountains gradually
descended into the plains and occupied the lands, which their forefathers
had abandoned centuries earlier. For a generation after the last of the
barbarians had gone, no settled government seems to have existed in the
country, though we hear of petty chiefs, who exercised authority over their
neighbours. But in 1290 a Roumanian leader, named Radou Negrou, came down
from the Carpathians and established his sway over Wallachia. The early
princes have not left much mark upon history. Radou Negrou and his first
five successors, whose reigns together fill about a century, were chiefly
occupied in repelling the claims of the kings of Hungary to their newly-constituted
state and resisting the efforts of the Popes to convert them to the Roman
Catholic faith. But the matrimonial alliances, which they made with the
Serbian monarchs at a time when Serbia was at its zenith, show that they
must have been personages of considerable influence. But in 1386 a strong
man arose in Wallachia, who is known in the annals of his country as Mirtschea
the Old, or the Great. Like several Balkan rulers Mirtschea obtained the
throne by means of a horrible domestic tragedy. It is said that he killed
his brother and seized his crown. But such violent deeds were so common
in that age that they attracted little notice, while the appearance of
a new and terrible enemy in the country demanded the presence of a vigorous
ruler in Wallachia. In 1391 the Turks for the first time crossed the Danube.
Nearly thirty years earlier a Roumanian contingent had assisted the Serbs
in their disastrous attempt to recapture Adrianople from the Mussulmans,
and Roumanian soldiers fought by the side of their fellow-Christians on
the fatal field of Kossovo, where the Serbian Empire fell in 1389. The
Sultan Bajezet sent an army across the Danube to punish Mirtschea for this
act of hostility. Mirtschea, weakened by the destruction of a large part
of his army at Kossovo, was defeated, captured, and sent for a time to
Broussa in Asia Minor. He was, however, soon set free on condition of paying
an annual tribute to the Turks. This "first capitulation" provided that
"the country should be governed by its own laws, and that its ruler should
have the power of making war and peace." But the document proceeds to state
that "in return for Our great condescension in having accepted this rayah
amongst the other subjects of Our Empire, he will be bound to pay into
Our Treasury, every year, the sum of six thousand red piasters of the country."
But Mirtschea did not long remain the obedient vassal of the Sultan. He
made an alliance with his old enemy, the King of Hungary, against the common
foe, and the two allies took part in the great battle of Nicopolis in 1396,
when the Turks gained a signal victory over the fine flower of Christian
chivalry. Recognising that all was lost, Mirtschea withdrew to his own
dominions, where the Turks soon followed him. But this time they were not
successful. The Wallachian army routed them with such slaughter that they
retired, and the defeat and capture of the Sultan Bajazet by Timour the
Tatar at Angora a few years later gave rise to a disputed succession, which
was most favourable to the Roumanian cause. Mirtschea, who was not only
a good soldier but a clever diplomatist, played off one Turkish pretender
against another until the accession of Mohammed I reunited the scattered
forces of the Ottoman Empire and forced him to submit. For a second time
Wallachia bowed before a Turkish suzerain, while preserving her local independence.
Mirtschea died in 1418, not long after this
second submission to the Turks. Had he been born at a period when they
were less powerful, he might have founded a strong kingdom.
The next quarter of a century, in both Wallachia
and Moldavia, was marked by civil wars, which distracted the principalities
when they ought to have been preparing for a struggle against the Turks.
In both of them the law of succession to the throne was the cause of great
mischief. There was no fixed system of heredity, but every member of the
reigning family had the right to succeed if elected by the nation, represented
by an assembly of great nobles and clergy. If the last prince had only
one son, all went smoothly; but if he had more than one, the land was honeycombed
with intrigues, and there were as many parties as members of the princely
family. Nor was that all. When one of the candidates had at last seated
himself on the throne, he often found it necessary to secure the support
of some stronger power to keep him there.
1 Founded by Dorians
from Heraclea Pontica at the end of the 6th century BC.
2 The Germans or Saxons
(sach sens), called Transylvania's lands Siebenburgen, a name generally
believed to refer to the seven fortified towns they built there. The seven
cities are: Bistrita (Bistritz), Brasov (Kronstadt), Cluj-Napoca
(Klausenburg), Medias (Mediasch), Sebes
(Muhlbach), Sibiu (Hermannstadt), Sighisoara (Schassburg).
3 The bridge originally
consisted of twenty piers, each 163 feet apart, 145 feet high, and 58 feet
broad.